Abstract:
Intratextuality is one of the explicit forms of intertextuality and it refers to
auto-reference or auto-influence and tries to highlight the similarities, the
repetitive and the distinctive traits appearing in different works of the same
writer.
The phenomenon of interatextuality characterizes the works of
Mohammed Dib, notably
Simorgh
(2003) and the posthumous
Laëzza
(2006). In
these works intratextuality exists on all the levels of writing. In deed, there are
common aspects which may be marked even on the level of the paratext, thus,
inviting interpretations of the existing similarities.
Moreover, such literary phenomenon blears the frontiers between the
different genres, the continuity and order by directing all the mechanisms of
writing to realize one form: fragmentation, intrgenerisity and deconstruction.
In fact, this complex structure of
Simorgh
and
Laëzza
enriches the two
works with a diversity of themes including those of mythology and actuality.
Finally, interatextuality appears in the repetition of some specific
characterization which signify the originality of the two works of Dib and give
birth to a new genre in question
