Abstract:
At the confluence of many areas, our research work has despréoccupations both linguistic, educational and informational. In nousbasant on our own observations of class and on the results of nosdifférentes field investigations, including written traces, we avonsdécouvert among our random sample of convenience which is constituéd student volunteers from two universities adopting two systèmesd teaching academics different (Skikda and Batna).We have identifiéles same difficulties related to the production of texts argumentative in foreign françaislangue (FLE). The first objective of the research is to contribute to a better knowledge of the place given and of the actual role del argumentation in the two systems Various academic, the LMD for experimental legroupe Skikda, and the classic license for the Group of checkingthe BATNA. In the corpus of written production in phase of the pretest in évaluationdiagnostique as those that we are studying, we found descomportements similar among all of the informants. This leads to a didactic autreréflexion on the acquisition of this same jurisdiction argumentativeen showing that the interaction between native speakers and not through échangesdans the forum can strengthen their acquisition of the target language according to the normestandard which uses an approach of immersive type. To locate the méthodologiede the investigation, we have appealed to a mixed approach which alternates deuxapproches, the qualitative and the quantitative. The method of analysis qualitativeprend into account the data collected from the questionnaires and desentretiens. The quantitative method with respect to it, allows to quantify leproblème of language to study. We have on this level there analyzed the informationsrecueillies on the basis of statistics of digital way. To do this, nousavons had recourse to the descriptive statistics using defréquences distributions with their corresponding variables and calculations of pourcentagesprésentés in the form of tables. The results of the analysis show that nosinformateurs those who are subject to the experimentation have progressed façonsignificative between the two phases at the micro-level structural (including on theplan the jurisdiction ARGUMENTATIVE WRITTEN. To finish, we show in the straight line of our work How to partirde this same process of negotiation which involves the same informants inthe same dialogic debate arrive in a report to the otherness to unconsensus around the chosen theme despite the divergence of opinions existing on lesujet according to the concept of the -acting- communicational developed by the author(Jürgen Habermas 1991:241).
