Résumé:
The problem of this study is trying to search around know you here a difference in the pattern of supervision in the public sector and the private sector on the basis of two types of behavior supervisory and this came our class primer to pose the problem and among its constituent elements in addition to clarifying the importance that importance with reference to previous studies, as well as addressing the goals it seeks to achieve with human and spatial boundaries of the study and hypotheses that we seek to achieve and verify the authenticity of which are as follows: The general Hypothesis: Supervisory behavior varies depending on the public or private sector.The Derivative hypotheses: 1. Focuses supervisor in the public sector more on supervisory interested behavior human relations. 2. Focuses supervisor in the private sector is more on supervisory interested behavior work. Then came the first chapter r and the second chapter of touching the theoretical background to the study by addressing variable of the concepts of the presidency and the leadership and supervision and patterns and the definition and role of supervisor, and objectives as well as to address the organization and its principles and its schools and its forms. As for the practical side:
In the third chapter to determine the field of study and field procedures and
method of selection of the sample as the sample included two categories of persons class supervisors and includes (08) four in the public sector and the other in the private sector, and the category of workers and include (80) factor Distributors (40) factor in both sectors. In addition to address the curriculum of the user who is in the use of one type of questionnaire to measure the behavior of supervisory and statistical definition of the methods that were used in the data analysis. While we dealt with in the fourth chapter view and analyze the results in tabular form, comment and discuss these results and their interpretation in the light of the hypotheses put forward with suggestions and recommendations and difficulties, has been reached with the following results: - That the supervisor does not focus on supervision interested in human relationships in the public sector or in the private sector. - The fact that the moderator in the private sector focuses more on supervisory interested behavior work and production rather than in the public sector. Thus it can be said that the hypothesis has not materialized.
