إشكالية السلطة و حاجات الفاعلين الإجتماعيين في المؤسسة العمومية الصناعية الجزائرية

Abstract

The Authority as a mechanism of social mechanisms and organizational, which aims to achieve social control of human group or social organization that, through the mechanisms of and interactions of this power with the social surroundings, is seeking individuals, through the accreditation process and the privacy of democratic representation and legitimacy, to achieve their needs, their demands And aspirations, which shape our focus of attention with respect to symmetries social actors to the regulatory authority of the institution of public industry as a field social socio - economic and cultural, and how to interact with him in their quest to achieve their different needs and the ability to provide this social organization of any plant of the mechanisms and strategies ways to reach it, and in fact derived from this study, the dimensions of social reality experienced by Algeria and social changes experienced by various groups Socio - economic, unique and growing protest movements and demands, especially those calling for higher wages and improve the purchasing power of workers and staff. And complete the process within the framework of research methodology was employed descriptive approach, in the context of the erosion characteristics of the authoritarian model practitioner and adopted within the institution of public and industrial as well as the extent to which this form of strategic thinking and system Tserep develop and stimulate the development of human resources at the heart of its concerns. And this study has covered a time allocation boat two years of research and bibliographic reviews, and consulting methodology and specialized knowledge and academic for a group of professors in the field of sociological research, and then formulate the research problem, which came in the form of three key questions: 1 - Is it a form of power is located meetings of the actors to ensure their needs and achieve their goals Within the institution of public industrial or impede the investigation? . 2 - What are the tools and means used and the strategies of the Party Social actors to achieve their needs and their goals within the institution of public industrial?. 3 - Are the needs of social actors are the needs and fit the strategy and goals of the institution Global Industrial?. The formulation of hypotheses, which came to form the pro: A - The authoritarian acts of the device is functional walk - Management - of the institution, may create Impression that they do not understand the needs and goals of social actors, and work only on the monopoly Power and resources within the global industrial organization. B - social actors may be used in order to achieve their goals and needs strategies The act of belonging to a collective and common goals, and spread a sense of exclusion from the system Steering and participatory or for reasons of regional hierarchy. C - are often the goals of social actors hidden behind the overall objectives of the institution, but They may become relevant in the case of the path opposite feeling to meet their demands and needs And their participation in the formulation of strategies for the organization. D - in light of economic conditions and local social and global view of the nature and Altsieri system of public industrial enterprises, may represent the physiological needs and Security needs and appreciation of the most important needs that social actors seek to achieve. Y - may not be able form of institutional power within the current industrial fabric to provide System of power relations and understanding adapted to the needs of social actors in Public industrial enterprise. Then initiate the process of induction and scrutiny and monitoring data and field information, by employing a range of research tools, including observation, questionnaire And the corresponding addition to the employment of the statistical tool and a method of analyzing data based on three levels, namely, description, disassembly (interpretation) and installation. Has allowed us to inter stages of research and methodological tools to gain access to the previous set of results and conclusions were highlighted: 1 - The model authoritarian Almentahj within the institutional framework is characterized by the global industrial Feature of marginalization, exclusion and the routine. 2 - a lack of public enterprise industrial general strategy and future plans aimed at Development of the institution and the development of technological capabilities and resources, financial, managerial, organizational And human resources. 3 - twice the global industrial organization cope with the economic and social surroundings as Inter overlaps in the terms of reference and objectives of the actors on the conduct of officials as well as To chaos in market production and which do not allow the institution of public industrial From marketing their products in ways good and this is mainly due to the lack of this institution for a property Competitiveness. 4 - Global Industrial Corporation does not provide a regulatory framework and allows to meet the needs of socially Social actors and works to motivate and develop their abilities and qualifications. 5 - double the level of production, and lack of public industrial enterprise of the mechanisms that values Different levels of effectiveness and efficiency which is reflected in the other preparations workers Coordinated approach to raising Mrdrdihm Victvon levels of routine production. 6 - Lack of job management and human resource development in the global industrial organization, but With regard to the conduct of users through the conduct of attendance and tardiness and grant Cost-effectiveness. 7 - Joe the rule of conflict within the institution of public industrial products between the various categories, groups, and Tratbaat social actors with regard to the distribution of resources and privileges.