الخلاصة:
The repressive function of the sectoral regulation authorities has preventive objectives aimed at controlling these sectors. However, in the event of irregularities, prevention is not valid. The penalties that express the deterrent aims of this function, which have conditions for practicing it, should not be signed. Sanctions against freedom and respect for general principles. Where these authorities shall sign the appropriate penalty to the extent of the offense committed against the violators of the rules of competition in the market. .In addition, the regulation authorities can find a solution to the dispute before them by adopting alternative means of specific sectors called ""arbitral authorities"" that have great effectiveness in settling the economic dispute because of the great role it plays. In the application of the authority to sign the penalty ""repressive function"" by the sectoral regulation authorities must respect a set of legal principles enshrined in the Constitution and the law as the principle of legality, the principle of personal punishment, the principle of proportionality and the principle of non-retroactivity, Of the rights of defense, independence and impartiality. The judicial control of the repressive function of the sectoral regulation authorities is also of great importance because of the nature of the relationship between the judge and the control authorities, which range from a complementary and reciprocal relationship and a competitive litigation relationship, where the disputes are subject to general rules governing the distribution of jurisdiction between the judicial authorities
competent to control the decisions of the control authorities and the nature of the procedures followed before and the extent of privacy compared to The general procedural rules established in the Code of Civil and Administrative Procedure for the traditional authorities
