Résumé:
The focus of this research is on international humanitarian intervention between the provisions of international law on the one hand and the provisions of international criminal law on the other hand. Since humanitarian intervention raises many legal problems because of the absence of an exact and clear concept in international law due to the multiplicity of jurisprudential opinions between supporters and rejecters. The ambiguity is still lacking in the absence of a legal text that sets out its limits and criteria and the part authorized to resort to it. Are they the collective states or Individual state? And that through our research we have concluded that the practical reality proved that humanitarian intervention is only a legal cover for invading countries to achieve their own interests and interests for the target country to intervene only and not to protect victims of gross violations of human rights which have reached the extent of gravity of the human conscience which, in
accordance with the Charter of the United Nations has become a breach of international peace and security or even the threat. In order for intervention to be legitimate in accordance with the provisions of international law, it must be with the United Nations organization and a correct resolution of the form and object of its Charter, otherwise it would be considered illegal under international criminal law because it is an international crime that is the basis of international criminal responsibility Before the international criminal court.
