Afficher la notice abrégée
dc.contributor.author |
بن كرور, ليلى |
|
dc.contributor.author |
طاشور, عبد الحفيظ |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-05-23T09:48:38Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-05-23T09:48:38Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018-10-25 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://depot.umc.edu.dz/handle/123456789/1920 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The first or the secondary case, as stated in the case law, one of the objective claims invoking a temporary case, which is considered as one of the defense automatisms put by the legislator of the law to guarantee the defense of the accused, to confront the charges in court.
The legislator conditioning this kind of claim to a set of formal condition and objective the accused must indicate it before any defense in the object in a way explicit and explicit, so that it influences one of the principles of the crime by denial, as long as it is supported by such a fact, or a title deed owned by the latter to reinforce its seriousness, and if the first assumption according to required by law, two important effects.
The first effect is : the accused bears the burden of proof, contradictorily and exceptionally of the original requiring that the public prosecutor's office bear this charge and this by the request of the latter to introduce his action in the deadlines set by the criminal court before the competent courts, criminal or civil, or even administrative given the nature of the legal claim so that it is a means the second effect of the public action, so that if the respondent before the criminal court, which confirms the introduction of the action before the competent court, the latter has rendered a judgment preliminary ruling for a stay of the public action until the day on which the courts have jurisdiction by final judgment, knowing that the arrest is obligatory, which is the case stated by the state of the initial payment statements, or that the arrest is temporary so that it can be judged by the judge. |
|
dc.language.iso |
ar |
|
dc.publisher |
Université Frères Mentouri - Constantine 1 |
|
dc.subject |
الدفع الأولية |
|
dc.subject |
المسائل الفرعية |
|
dc.subject |
وسائل الدفاع |
|
dc.subject |
عبء الاثبات |
|
dc.subject |
سلطة القاضي |
|
dc.subject |
التقديرية |
|
dc.subject |
وسائل الاثبات |
|
dc.subject |
حرية اقتناع القاضي الجزائي |
|
dc.subject |
secondary case |
|
dc.subject |
defense tools |
|
dc.subject |
the burden of proof |
|
dc.subject |
estimated judg's autority |
|
dc.subject |
proof means |
|
dc.subject |
the judge conviction |
|
dc.subject |
les execeptions préables |
|
dc.subject |
les guestions préjudicielles |
|
dc.subject |
moyens de défense |
|
dc.subject |
la charge de preuve |
|
dc.subject |
le pouvoir estimatif du juge pénal |
|
dc.subject |
les moyens de preuves |
|
dc.subject |
la conviction du juge pénal |
|
dc.title |
الحكم فـي الدفع الأولي وأثره على حرية اقتناع القاضي الجزائي |
|
dc.title.alternative |
دراسة تحليلية على واقع التشريع والقضاء الجزائريين. |
|
dc.type |
Thesis |
|
Fichier(s) constituant ce document
Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)
Afficher la notice abrégée